Notes on Charlie Kirk and Iryna Zarutska
I abandoned None Dare Call It Treason, my current-events blog, a few years ago. Things were happening so fast and furious, I couldn't keep up, it was a large time suck, and it degraded my mental health. I decided to focus on my life and walk with the Lord, which I recommend.
However, this week felt like something changed and compelled me to write. This isn't a right-wing post. I'm not MAGA. I'm much worse, as I see multiple sides and layers of deception. Most Americans identify as Independent (43%), and about 28% identify as Republican or Democrat. They are pretty even, if we are to believe the numbers. But that's not why I logged in today. This week it felt like a major spiritual shift occurred in the U.S. and we were unwittingly shoved down a dark corridor. I wouldn't mention this unless I actually felt it. I think we all did.
The narrative of the deaths of Charlie Kirk and Iryna Zarutska depend on who you tune into. My belief is these were staged events to promote division and divide and conquer, classic Jesuit programs for destabilization. Stay with me now. Iryna was killed by a black man who was let out of the system multiple times, a man who bragged about killing a white girl afterward. She was also an immigrant from war-torn Ukraine, adding to her tragic martyrdom. (I also question what's going on in Ukraine, but let's stay on task.) Charlie Kirk is a famous Conservative debater, known for his quick wit, extensive knowledge, and often-abrasive persona. He was polarizing in life and equally so in death. Again, sticking with the narrative. I don't believe either died. If they did, the narrative we are to believe remains the same. The fact that Charlie's organization was called Turning Point USA says a lot. They want this event — staged or not — to be a turning point in this country's future.
Let me clarify I was not a supporter of Charlie Kirk. He seemed to me too hard, too proud, too abrasive, too unChristian to espouse a Christian ethic, as he was clearly far from the spirit in which Jesus moved (yes, I acknowledge Jesus was abrasive at times, calling the scribes and Pharisees names and flipping tables and telling people they must eat His flesh and drink His blood, but He had a different purpose). Charlie seemed to thrive on division and contention, not teaching, but embarrassing. As a thinking Christian, I found him intolerable. He stated his walk with Christ was at the center of his being, yet those who walk with Christ over time become gentler, more loving, more understanding. Charlie became more grating and polarizing, as if that was his aim. And I believe Charlie the actor's goal was achieved. (He was yet another Archie Bunker character like Don Trump. Makes Christians and conservatives look cold and angry.) I wish him luck in his next role. Yes, Christianity is polarizing. It divides because the world is made up of tares and wheat. Division is a natural outcome of telling the truth. Charlie seemed to relish division and strife, as if it was his job. I believe it was. But he went too far, basically destroying people in public. Embarrassing. Shameful. Egregious. Ugly.
Iryna also appears to be an actor. These are highly publicized events in public in broad daylight. Iryna and Charlie are being memorialized, her by murals across the country, Charlie in many other ways. Elon Musk is pitching in by funding murals? Bro, that's too much.
Because I value my time, I support my statement with only a few references. I suggest watching the videos, even though you may feel squeamish, as you quickly realize we've been lied to and you're basically watching a movie. Which raises a lot of questions and leads us to more terrifying conclusions because Charlie and Iryna were part of a much larger deception. They were actors, now reassigned to some other gig, as they clearly did not die. Supposedly, they both received trauma to the neck. Should that happen, death occurs immediately and blood sprays in all directions because the brain uses a lot of blood and it travels through the neck. It's high-pressure stuff. People who study crime scenes say a cut to the neck makes the blood spray everywhere. (My ex cut her finger once, and I cleaned blood off the ceiling and the walls for days.) We literally do not see that with either of these. With Iryna, we don't see blood until she's on the floor, and she's covering her mouth and looks scared for many seconds before leaving her seat and resting where we can't see her. There should have been a massive amount of blood immediately. With Charlie, it depends on the narrative, but say we go with it was a shot to the neck (good shot, by the way, definitely a pro), then there would have been insane blowback out the back of his neck (it's mostly soft tissue and the exit wound is always massive). The front wound is smaller, but it would also have exploded with blood because it was a neck wound. The massive amount of trauma to his neck (front and rear) would have showered everyone around him in blood. It was more like a faucet turned on, the "blood" flowing down his arm and chest. Completely unrealistic. And the bullet would continue traveling, hitting someone or something behind. I shot enough animals to know that if someone shot his neck, there isn't much stopping the bullet. If you believe, as Alex Jones said (laughable), he was wearing a bulletproof vest and the object we see appearing on his right shoulder was a bullet that bounced off his vest and entered his neck (on the opposite side of his body), then there would still be a massive amount of blood literally spraying from his neck. (Bulletproof vests absorb impact, so a ricochet is unlikely.) Then there's the thing with his ring, showing a tampering of the video, as we see with the splice in Iryna's video, a well.
There was another shooting Wednesday the 10th. This story is most likely a false flag, as are the others. But, notice the conclusion that the shooter was "likely radicalized by some extremist network," which gives the powers that be means to do more shooting drills, terrorizing the population, and dividing us until they get what they want. They control all sides, navigating us toward a predetermined destination. They want us to believe these events are going to radicalize conservatives, who are almost immune to such things by their very nature. They're too busy working 12-hour days, building their businesses, and raising their families, generally living the American dream. But the media has to build the framework of a narrative, just as they did with Waco and Timothy McVeigh (who is FBI agent Paul Wysopal, and very much alive and well), in order to demonize a peaceful, largely God-fearing population in order to eventually persecute and exterminate them, as part of their New World Order (which they planned to implement in 1984 but were set back in their timeline). Regarding the NWO, there are believed to be warring factions sometimes working together to bring it to pass. But the Vatican is involved on all levels. The warring factions will turn on the Babylonian system in the end times, the Bible tells us. She will be destroyed in a moment, likely by a nuclear device detonated in Vatican City. Looking forward to the end of that rotten system. In the meantime, it doesn't look like the powers that be will disarm us anytime soon. It looks like they focused their efforts on a civil war instead.
Here are my references for the Charlie and Iryna "murders."
The Shooting of Charlie Kirk, a book published the day before, but which supposedly details the event. It's a signal this was a false flag. You always have these with FFs. Call it a glitch in the matrix. AI generated. It was taken down.
Iryna's last moments. No blood until she is out of sight. It should have been raining blood in there. No one seems remotely concerned, which now makes sense.
Charlie's last moments. Almost looks like a man in a mask. (I know he has a big head, but damn.) The impact is all wrong. The blood is all wrong. There is the moving dot. A letter from “freedom” on his shirt disappears (maybe that's the moving dot LOL). The pillowy look of something under his shirt moving. The bad graphics and nonsensical movement of blood. His ring moves to a different finger while he is shot (AI has trouble with fingers, for some reason). He's wearing a white shirt and gushing blood which somehow doesn't stain his shirt or soak in? It doesn't spurt. Kinda leaks nonchalantly. Giving an A for effort, though.
This is a longer video which explains the purpose and methods of how this narrative works and where it's headed. Also examines the film more. Highly recommend this one.
Feel free to disagree. Not saying I didn't miss anything. Waiting a few days usually reaps the benefit of clarity. I waited until I realized I was right about my original assessment, which is these are psyops. More information will come out, but I won’t update this unless I am absolutely wrong. I'm not clairvoyant, just have the benefit of pattern recognition. However, I would caution all Christians to steer clear of political causes and right-wing/conspiracy rhetoric that involves the right/left paradigm, racism, antisemitism, etc. Fight in the spiritual. Get into spiritual warfare, binding and loosing, as I suggested in a previous post. You cannot win this fight in the flesh. They have you beat. The only hope for this nation is a full-scale revival on a similar level of the early church in the book of Acts. All hope rests in Jesus. I understand this post may make some laugh or terrify others, but it's okay. Even if I'm wrong, Jesus is still in control (and I wish I was wrong). If all seems hopeless, that's an effect of the truth, but you're only looking at what the devil is doing. Look to Jesus and what He's doing, what He wants to do. Let Him use you for His purposes. There is so much hope and joy and peace in Him. The time is short. Stay vigilant and prayerful. I'm praying for more time and to see the devil's plans turned upside down. Pray with me?
Thank you for reading. And God bless.
Christian blog: a-better-hope.blogspot.com
Comments
Post a Comment