The curious case of Elizabeth Smart

So, I posted this on my other blog and then my other blog stopped working. Literally stopped working. I can't edit my posts. It also posted it below my previous posts over there, which is something I've never seen before. So I'm posting it here, too, cus nah nah nah nah nah. Clearly, someone or something does not want this out there. But I don't quit easily.

Here begins my second attempt at writing about Elizabeth Smart and trauma-based mind control (TBMC). Who knew it would be such a colossal undertaking and fraught with unforeseen obstacles? Perhaps that is dramatic. I worked for two or three hours on a post Weebly decided to delete instead of post, which wasn't even the beginning of sorrows. I also sent myself an email with links I planned to use weeks ago, and the email disappeared. Since writing about TBMC on my old blog, I had a number of similar issues, and it seems the issues followed me. I'm not suggesting something nefarious is happening technologically (though the thought did cross my mind), but perhaps something spiritually happened. Let's try again.

​As a refresher, or if you've never heard of Elizabeth Smart, you can read about her ordeal being kidnapped, ritually married, and raped daily when she was 14. It was a major storyline nearly two decades ago. As a bonus, the article relates how she was once asked while on a date if she enjoyed being raped when she was a captive. No, she didn't enjoy being raped, dude. Yes, some women have a rape fantasy (though I think it is a mislabeled submission fantasy), but Elizabeth was brought up Mormon, and Mormonism barely allows for married women to have pleasure in married sex. But this is more of the "men bad" agenda, both the man's question and fundamentalism/patriarchy in general. But let's not digress so early. 

​Let's start with the Mormon church, which Fritz Springmeier tells us is a mind-controlled slave factory. Even from the outside, something appears to be not quite right with that church system. In my neck of the woods, we have a FLDS (Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) compound, which is an offshoot of Mormonism that still practices polygamy/child marriage, as well as other illegal activities. Their compound, now largely deserted, was heavily defended. If you neared their property, the expectation was to be met by armed guards. If you want to be left alone or be invisible, South Dakota is the place to be. The stories from women who escaped the FLDS bondage are telling. The system is sick and broken, though it considers itself a part of Christianity. I consider it a cult, though many consider it remotely related to Christianity, enough to tarnish true Christianity. 

When I originally heard Elizabeth's story, I had many questions. Things simply didn't add up. Shoddy police work, a flimsy narrative, and bad actors conspired to produce more questions than answers. I didn't like the fact that the kidnapper came in through an open window, she was abducted while laying next to her sister (they shared a bed), and her sister did nothing for two hours before she told her parents. She was afraid of being abducted, too, but once the kidnapper left, why wouldn't you run and tell your parents? Or why wouldn't you scream your fool head off when you saw someone roaming about your house in the middle of the night? That would be a knee-jerk reaction to something novel and startling. But perhaps things like that happened frequently, such as is the case with TBMC victims. I don't like all the questions that were never answered (JonBenet Ramsey, anyone?). Elizabeth wandered the streets with her captors in her own town, often near her home. She wasn't looking for an opportunity to escape. She accepted her situation, which is clear evidence of mind control. According to her parents, she took only a few days after being home to go back to her normal self. Huh? More evidence of prior abuse. 

Her sister was the key to what happened all along, and when she decided she remembered who kidnapped Elizabeth, that's when the case was cracked? Why didn't Elizabeth want to leave her captors? Her dad said she was "brainwashed," but was it just Stockholm Syndrome or TBMC? They are one and the same. Why was the window open, allowing the captor to waltz right in? Why why why? If you ask questions, you are the bad guy. The shrill voices ask, "Hasn't she been through enough?" I know, from my own experience, human beings don't always think rationally when under extreme stress. But that doesn't take away the feeling there is much more going on here. Consider this reaction to Elizabeth being interviewed: "The incredible grace of kidnap victim Elizabeth Smart clashed with the 'mindless callousness' of Nancy Grace, which the Columbia Journalism Review declared 'might have set a new standard.' While Smart thought she was on the show to talk about a bill about a sex offenders’ registry, Grace kept asking her about her abduction, including the veil her kidnapper made her wear in public, until the Utah woman shut down the 'insane' lawyer from Atlanta." Got that? Don't question the narrative. 

Pedophilia is one way the new world order gets things done. Pedophiles are easily blackmailed, as are cheaters and the like. But most people have an extreme disdain for pedophilia. Notice the powers that be are trying to change our associations about pedophilia, making it seem like just another sexual lifestyle. But blackmail is a huge mover and shaker in the the new world order. The basest human beings are the most blackmailable. After Elizabeth was abducted, scrutiny turned to Ed, her father because authorities thought he was being blackmailed because he is gay. That is an odd first thought, don't you think? I believe he was blackmailed before that, though, and his daughters and wife were in mind-control programs. Blackmail is a constant fear in TBMC families. And now Ed is promoting the gay agenda, like a good slave. I am absolutely certain this man had more to hide than his homosexuality. 

Brice Taylor, a mind-controlled slave, was groomed to become "internationally known as a leader in ritual child abuse," (meaning she campaigned against those things) according to her book, and that is more than a little ironic, considering what she and her children endured. Using an abused, mind-controlled slave and her children for this supposed purpose is just sick. And diabolical. The truth is truly stranger than fiction. If they were doing this double-bind sort of thing with their slaves in  the 70s, surely they are doing the same and more now. Elizabeth Smart founded an organization dedicated to preventing sexual assault/abuse/trafficking, speaks about her experiences frequently, and has even blamed porn for what happened to her. Why porn?

​Yes, porn is bad and leads many men astray. Most of the men and women in porn are TBMC victims. Its purpose is to debase society (a new world order goal). But blaming porn for her ritual abuse and mind control is ... a clever diversion. And who is going to defend porn? Not too many. It's a perversion of something God gifted to married couples. It is bondage labeled as freedom. Considering her crusades against sexual abuse and porn, it is entirely possible her controllers use her in those very ways, though not for the mainstream consumer but for higher levels. Most porn is produced with low-level slaves who are used and then quickly discarded. If Elizabeth is used that way, it is not mainstream. Also, I question all philanthropic organizations because experience taught me they are often fronts for the very thing they supposedly combat. How many children's organizations are busted for abusing and trafficking children? More than just a mere coincidence. 

Fritz Springmeier mentions the use of philanthropic entities such as women's shelters and orphanages to catch runaway mind-controlled slaves. I hate to say it, but when I see someone who is most likely a mind-controlled slave campaigning for a cause, I wonder what the true agenda is. Unfortunately, the devil does not play fair, and we should not be ignorant of his devices. Those familiar with the book The Franklin Cover-up know Nebraska's Boys Town has been running slaves for decades, and much of the programming is done through the Roman Catholic System (such as what happened to Cathy O'Brien), which to many can do no wrong. Beware of philanthropic institutions and those with a religious guise because they are often doing the devil's work. I already mentioned the instance with Nancy Grace when Elizabeth dodged questions about her abduction, instead focusing on "pushing the bill through." Here is someone who regularly speaks about her abduction (about 80 times a year), but she didn't want to talk about it then? Why? Because her handlers want to push through legislation, just as they did with Brice Taylor. And now Elizabeth is on board with a movie about her experiences. Movies about (supposedly) real events are always propaganda designed to shape public opinion. Wouldn't we all want our life's worst moments captured forever on film? 

The devil's henchmen also like their slaves to know they can't run or hide and the abuse will continue. Consider Elizabeth's recent sexual assault on an airplane. As we all know, one cannot run away on an airplane. A slave is always a slave, no matter where they are. And, a lot of the time, Elizabeth is at speaking engagements, talking about her experiences. I found something interesting about one of those engagements. 

This article about Ghislaine Maxwell "staring down" Elizabeth at one of her speaking engagements/fundraisers is curious, needless to say. If you don't know who Maxwell is, she is Jeffrey Epstein's mind-controlled sex slave procurement robot. That's a long title. She's a lackey for Epstein (who is most definitely not dead, as he was photographed by drone on his island after his supposed suicide). She's also a handler. Most slaves are also handlers; that's part of the progression. What was a sex-trafficking slave/handler doing at Elizabeth Smart's speaking engagement, considering Elizabeth endured exactly what Maxwell did for Epstein? Because Elizabeth is a slave. And many "rich men of the earth" have desires for illegal things like underage girls/sex slaves. Many, including the Clintons, British Royalty, Mark Zuckerberg, and President Trump, as well as many athletes and celebrities, found their way to Epstein's island. The constant need for sex slaves drives the new world order agenda. Lots of blackmail and coercion. 

If you know what Wizard of Oz programming is, this article will raise your hackles. I even read another article that referred to Elizabeth as a sort of Dorothy. If I had only read one, I may not have caught it. But two separate articles called her Dorothy. This site says this about the red shoes: "The transfer of the Ruby slippers from the Wicked Witch of the East to Dorothy publicly depicts the real method of transference of power used in Illuminati rituals." Not only that, this article reveals something else. The night she was abducted, Elizabeth read a book to her little sister. That book? Ella Enchanted. Read the first paragraph about the plot (of the movie, same as the book) here, and I think you'll agree it sounds a lot like mind-control programming. She's under a spell to be obedient? What a nice bedtime story. They have to constantly reinforce the programming, and it is important the rest of us are programmed, as well. Much of the article is garbage, of course, but makes the point that Mormonism's fundamental ideas about sex and purity (which most will translate to Christianity) are wrong, which is ... sigh ... part of the new world order agenda, which is to debase ourselves with sexual impurity. Elizabeth didn't have a choice. But the rest of us do. Well, most of us. The New Yorker article is full of references most will not catch, but those familiar with TBMC will understand they are telling us she is a slave.

This blog mentions something interesting, which I did not consider at first. Elizabeth went missing for 9 months. Could it be she had a child during that time? TBMC victims are often chosen to have children for use within the beast system for many reasons. It's not impossible she had a child. The storyline was too convenient anyway. Her sister just decided one day she remembered who took Elizabeth? The guy who kidnapped her was a crazy messianic Mormon, anyway, right? He was completely demonized. So, case closed. But her captor did a whole lot of things a religious zealot would never do, such as drink alcohol and watch porn, and force Elizabeth to do the same. But he was crazy, right? While I'm on that tangent, many have pointed out all the celebrities who had miscarriages. They must be in a high-risk group for miscarriages? Or those babies are used for something else? I know many miscarriages are just that. It is very sad to lose a little one. But it seems disproportionate that Hollywood and the like are having so many miscarriages. Hollywood = witchcraft, after all. And most celebrities are slaves.

It is clear, even though I simply went through mostly mainstream media sites (and getting any truth from Google these days is hard), Elizabeth Smart is a mind-controlled slave, and a high-level one. She was chosen probably before she was born for this position. She and her children are still being used for various new world order functions. My heart cries out for her liberation, and I pray one day she and her family are liberated from TBMC. Her poise, and even her body posture, and way of speaking remind me of other mind-controlled slaves (many of whom I admire). It is that poise that makes her message so readily accepted by her audience. Part of her function is to tear down aspects of fundamental Christianity, to point fingers at the church (most people don't know Mormonism isn't true Christianity) and say they set her up for abuse or taught her wrong. Her father's programming does the same thing. He had to leave the church because there is no place for a gay man in Mormonism. Elizabeth Smart's story is used by many advocating microchipping children, which is something the Masons in my neck of the woods constantly push, too. Why do the Smart family advocacies involve new world order goals? Part of the new world order agenda is normalizing trauma, and not only that, but making it something good, as this story relates. She's grateful for what she endured? TBMC is rooted in generational, satanic abuse families. The design is to create a master race or ruling class structure (imagine a pyramid with the slave race as the base). TBMC is a dehumanizing process, but we are told it is much like a caterpillar becoming a butterfly. In the end, what we have is something beautiful. That's wrong, of course. In the end, we have a robot slave and no longer a human being with all their faculties. And they want to export that process to the rest of humanity, creating a planet of slaves.

Am I 100 percent positive about Elizabeth Smart being a slave? No, but maybe 99 percent. The Smarts fit the TBMC mold, the pattern of which I am aware. Even those familiar with TBMC may not see it to the extent I do. But that's the point. It is supposed to be an undetectable weapon. Is it possible Elizabeth endured some other form of mind control programming? Yes, TBMC is not the only kind, though I don't think the others are as effective at creating and maintaining the inner worlds. Dissociation that comes with trauma is what does that work. But it is possible. But a slave is a slave, no matter how they were created. It's also possible the whole story of her abduction and rape was made up. Why do we trust people who are clearly lying to tell us what happened? All we know is something happened that wasn't right. The actual perpetrators of that, I believe, are still at large.

I would like to add more to this post, but it is long enough. I pray for the release of all TBMC victims. My God is all-powerful and wants to set the captives free. (John 8:36, Isaiah 61:1) I pray the coming revival includes the liberation of millions of TBMC slaves. I'm ready to go to work. (Isaiah 6:8)

Thank you for reading, and God bless.

My new blog is here.